Information sharing without privacy safeguards is a problem, National Security Council spokeswoman says
The White House joined the growing chorus of
voices expressing concern over the proposed Cyber Intelligence Sharing
and Protection Act (CISPA) legislation that is scheduled for a vote in
the U.S. House of Representatives next week.
Caitlin Hayden, a spokeswoman for the White House's National Security Council echoed those sentiments in a statement made to The Hill newspaper late Tuesday.
Any cybersecurity legislation should include strong privacy protections, The Hill quoted Hayden as saying. "The nation's critical infrastructure cyber vulnerabilities will not be addressed by information sharing alone," she said in apparent reference to CISPA.
"Also, while information sharing legislation is an essential component of comprehensive legislation to address critical infrastructure risks, information sharing provisions must include robust safeguards to preserve the privacy and civil liberties of our citizens," Hayden is quoted as saying. "Legislation without new authorities to address our nation's critical infrastructure vulnerabilities, or legislation that would sacrifice the privacy of our citizens in the name of security, will not meet our nation's urgent needs."
Though the statement did not mention CISPA by name, Hayden's references to "information sharing" make clear that she is referring to CISPA because that is the only bill under consideration that calls for extensive sharing of information between the private sector and the government.
The White House's comments add to the crescendo of voices that are calling for CISPA to be stopped or seriously amended. U.S. Reps. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) and Dutch Ruppersberger (D-Md.) introduced CISPA in the House in November.
The bill is designed to help improve cybersecurity by allowing Internet companies to monitor and collect any information on users that they think might pose a threat to their networks or systems.
Rights groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the Center for Democracy and Technology maintain that CISPA's ambiguous wording can cause serious problems.
For instance, there's nothing in the language of the bill that would prohibit companies from monitoring private email messages, chat messages and Facebook postings simply by claiming a cybersecurity purpose to the monitoring. They can then share that information with any other entity, including the Department of Homeland Security and the National Security Agency, without judicial oversight. The bill affords Internet companies a great deal of immunity for conducting such information monitoring and sharing.
0 comments:
Post a Comment